Misperception of Iraq essays

Misperception of Iraq essays One of the most blatant and significant misperceptions floating around in the world today regards the war in Iraq. In spite of official findings to the contrary, including some admissions on the part of the Bush administration, many American citizens continue to believe both that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and that the nation was somehow linked to the terrorist attacks of September 11. Even though weapons inspectors and other investigators found no corroborating evidence to these claims, millions of citizens hold on dearly to this misperception, believing strongly that President Bush was correct to have invaded a sovereign nation. Many mainstream media sources have published articles or broadcasts on the fact that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and that Iraq cannot be linked to September 11. However, many people continue to believe the misperception that both these myths are true. The misperception thrives in large part because of the clever wording or spin of the Bush administration. Furthermore, for many people around the world, the misperception that many Americans hold is ridiculous and frightening. Regardless of how people feel about the President and whether or not he should be re-elected, the Iraq issue remains an important, relevant misperception on the part of the American people, a misperception that can No one will argue reasonably that Saddam Hussain was a good leader. He killed and persecuted numerous people and suppressed the citizens of Iraq for many years. He deserved to be removed from power. Therefore, Saddam Hussain's failure as a leader is not a misperception. However, the means by which the United States invaded Iraq resulted in countless civilian deaths and American soldier casualties and was also counter to the basic rules of international politics. After all, few nations in the world offered their ...

individual & court system essays

individual & court system essays Juries have had their day. Justice is too important to be left in the hands of 12 amateurs who would rather be elsewhere and lack judgement and expertise. The theory behind the use of juries in the justice system is that a group of randomly chosen citizens will represent the will of the entire community. Therefore, theoretically at least, the community as a whole controls the justice system. However, there is argument in favour of replacing juries with informed experts who are better qualified to serve justice in a group of people, because most jurors would rather be elsewhere and lack judgement and expertise. In contrast, some argue that the existing justice system works as desired, and so should not be changed. In order to examine the merits of both arguments, the advantages and disadvantages of juries must be compared, as must the advantages and disadvantages of replacing juries with experts. The main advantage of using juries in the justice system is that, supposedly, the views of the community are reflected in this group of people. By randomly selecting people for jury duty, it is hoped that these people will be representative of the will of the wider community, quite similar in theory to a parliament. The reason that this is said to be an advantage of using juries is that the aim of justice, in the criminal sense, is to protect the community as a whole from undesirable danger, therefore the members of the a community should be able to serve justice themselves. For example, a jury sentenced Tasmanian gunman Martin Bryant to life imprisonment, and this finding was met with resounding approval by the public, demonstrating the effectiveness of using a jury. Unfortunately, the will and views of any community are not defined clearly, and are usually quite diverse, and thus it is doubtful that every jurys findings represent the will of the majority in a community. However, p ositive public reaction to ...

Chinese History Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Chinese History - Essay Example The paper tells that the Ming Literature texts address issues of consumption in both negative and positive ways. However, they are not detached from a discourse of morality, governance and universal order discourse that links humanity from any class in the society. In the Ming China, the majority of the population was busy with issues of whether to consume enough of the available necessities of life to avoid death rather than the choices about consumption. The difference of access was clear in the choices in terms of the range of commodities to be used. The elite are the ones who make decisions on how things out to be. Therefore, as Clunas points out, â€Å" in the pre-industrial world of goods of the Ming elite is a clear parallel to the situation described by Adrian Forty as intrinsic to the more complex world of the nineteenth century in Europe and America†. Thus, the writings reveal the manner in which consumption f luxury goods affected decision-making and class struggles in Ming China. In my opinion, The Ming Literature texts address issues of consumption in Ming China and show that Ming was a materialistic individual who wanted to preserve the culture and class system of ancient China. The issue in Ming China was not about what to consume but about the amount to consume with respect to the different classes that people occupied. This clearly shows the class anxieties between the elite and the low classes where the elite wanted to preserve their status by all means. This explains the consumption of luxurious goods by the elites.